Kindergarteners who used Waterford’s adaptive reading program for at least 1,500 minutes scored higher at year’s end than low‑usage peers. Benefits were consistent across demographic groups, including students in special education and across racial and ethnic backgrounds, showing computer‑assisted instruction can help all young learners build strong early literacy skills.
Study Focus: School-Based
The Effects of Computer Assisted Instruction on Early Math and Literacy
Kindergarteners using Waterford Early Learning in 2023–2024 scored higher in literacy and math than a historical control group. Effect sizes ranged from moderate to large, with the strongest effects in foundational literacy, vocabulary, and operations/algebraic thinking. Results indicate that WEL can strengthen early learning across domains when paired with traditional instruction.
Long-Term and Early Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Early Childhood
Second‑grade students who used Waterford Early Learning in kindergarten, first, and second grade scored higher on district reading tests than peers who did not use it. Even those who stopped after first grade stayed ahead a year later, showing that early, sustained computer‑assisted instruction can produce lasting literacy outcomes.
Evidence for Dosage and Long-Term Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction
Students who used a computer‑based reading program in kindergarten and first grade scored higher one to two years later than peers who never used it or used it less. The largest effect sizes were found for students with high program usage, suggesting early, consistent CAI can support lasting reading success.
How Technology Drives Long-Term Literacy Success Across Demographics
Louisiana K–2 students who used Waterford Early Learning for two or three years scored higher than those with only one year of use. Even students with one year of program use outperformed nonusers a year after participation. Across all demographic groups, WEL users showed stronger results, demonstrating sustained positive effects on literacy development.